WEATHER IN LINCOLN COUNTY

lazerrose title=

audiology title=

barrelhead

prp

oceancreek

Coast Tree

Sema Roofing

wandr

occc

audiology title=

barrelhead
prp

oceancreek

Coast Tree

Sema Roofing

wandr

occc


barrelhead


Coast Tree

flocs

Voices: An opinion about growing canola…

Canola Field
Wikipedia photo

Canola Bloom
Wikipedia photo

Willamette Valley is the heart of Oregon’s lucrative specialty seed, fresh vegetable, clover, and organic industries. It is recognized for having a unique climate which allows for these industries to thrive. The Willamette Valley should be preserved and protected for these special purposes. Allowing canola production in what is currently a protected district would undermine this world renowned resource, the Valley’s economically important seed production industry, and large network of vegetable growers as well as our local food supply. Canola can be, and is, grown in other parts of Oregon. Let’s keep it that way.

The Oregon Department of Agriculture (ODA) should maintain the strongest possible protections for the Willamette Valley. Research from Oregon State University has demonstrated the risk of significant conflicts between existing specialty seed production and new canola planting on issues ranging from cross-contamination of high-value, pure seed strains to the introduction of hard-to-eradicate pests and plant diseases. To date, ODA has conducted no research that demonstrates the need for, or answers significant questions about, major shifts in its existing prohibitions on canola production in the Willamette Valley protected area. It is my belief that canola should continue to be banned from the Willamette Valley and the current canola rule be left in place, in full.

The ODA still wants canola in the Valley. Late in December, the ODA created a new proposed ruling that is dramatically different. In this version, the boundary remains the same and the total number of canola acreage allowed is theoretically 2,500. However, the ODA has the authority to grant a variance to a grower “near” the boundary to plant unlimited amounts of canola. These variances do not count towards the acreage cap – so why has the ODA listed a cap at all? And the rule does not prevent the ODA from increasing that cap at any time. Based on these facts, the cap appears to be a way to discourage public opposition.

Some growers that export their product to countries that have banned Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have been warned that if canola (rapeseed) is allowed they will no longer accept contracts from them. It is my opinion that this action will economically devastate the Willamette Valley, and it will no longer be the agricultural jewel of Oregon.

There have been hearings in Salem about this issue, I testified yesterday (1/23/13) against the proposal. I would estimate that there were about 75 people in attendance with approximately 40 people testifying. It is my estimation that at least 90% testified against canola. It is my concern, after all these hearings and the overwhelming testimonies against canola in the Willamette Valley will be ignored, favoring special interests i.e., Monsanto.

The deadline to have our voices heard is 1/25/13, please call or e-mail your Legislatures and the ODA to demand this folly be stopped.

ODA: info@oda.state.or.us …. Phone: 503-986-4550

Legislatures: http://www.leg.state.or.us/findlegsltr/

Katherine Howard Newport, Oregon

News Lincoln County invites comments on opinion pieces and entertains differing opinions on the subject matter. Send them to Dave@NewsLincolnCounty.com

Children – Our future benefit or future cost

Steve Salisbury’s view on Lincoln County measure 21-144
Tax proposal to fund the Lincoln County Children’s Trust

Now that we all have our ballots, many of you like me will fill them out and drop them off this weekend. It is a difficult challenge to separate fiction from fact on most offices and particularly measures. Does a No vote actually mean Yes when applied by a team of legal word smiths? It took me several reads and hours of study of the voters pamphlet. It was riddled with ambiguities that only one who could see the actual laws on the books today could properly analyze.

One measure however, jumped off the pages that needs little explanation. That is the measure 21-144 for the Children’s Trust of Lincoln County. The cases of abused children in Lincoln County have increased over 50% due in large part to the poor economy. Yet the donations and grant funds upon which the Children’s Advocacy Center is totally dependent have fallen by 50%. Talk about the perfect humanitarian storm, this is it.

These abused children, left untreated, will become one of our communities most expensive problems in the future. My wife and I have no local children or grandchildren. Yet, we are more than willing to pay 35 cents per thousand of Assessed Value as it will dramatically reduce our costs going forward. For the average county tax payer this means less than $120/year or less than $10/month. That is one car wash, one drive through lunch or two Grande Lattes per month. $120/year? How much do healthy children mean to you?

I am not wealthy. But I do however understand a good investment when I see one. And frankly, this is one of the few that I can see on this ballot. Whether you are an absentee owner or one who rents your home, this is the best investment you will ever make. The lifetime cost to the community for one victim is $210,000. Please vote for the Children. Vote Yes on 21-144.

Steve Salisbury
Newport, OR

barrelhead


Coast Tree

flocs

Coast Tree

flocs

Coast Tree

flocs

nlcad

Follow-us-tile