From Lincoln County Community Rights – Opponents of Aerial Pesticide and Herbicide Spraying
Timber Corporations Have More Rights Than People of Lincoln County, Says Court; Aerial Spray Ban Overturned
Court rules that state preemption overrides local control; denies the right of local communities to protect their health and safety at a higher standard than the state.
September 30, 2019
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Newport, Oregon: On September 23rd Judge Sheryl Bachart issued her ruling in the case of Rex Capri and Wakefield Farms, LLC vs. Dana W. Jenkins and Lincoln County. After reviewing written arguments and hearing oral arguments on October 9th, 2017, the judge made the determination that Measure 21-177 is invalid based on state law regulating pesticide use.
Affirming the claims of the plaintiffs means the law known as Measure 21-177, enacted by the voters of Lincoln County in 2017 to prohibit aerial spraying of pesticides, has been overturned.
“The fight for our legal, constitutional, and fundamental right of local self-government marches on, and it is going to take the political will of the people to make it a reality if we ever want to stop living under the thumb of corporate government.” said Rio Davidson, President of Lincoln County Community Rights.
Lincoln County Community Rights (LCCR) was allowed to intervene in (join) the case. The Siletz River watershed ecosystem, represented by Lincoln County resident Carol Van Strum, also filed to be part of the case, but was denied intervention by Judge Bachart.
In her judgment decision, Judge Bachart said that Measure 21-177 is an adoption of an Ordinance regarding pesticide use and is therefore subject to the preemptive effect of the Oregon Pesticide Act, which prohibits local governments from making any ordinance, rule or regulation governing pesticide sale or use. She therefore overturned the measure. She based the decision squarely on state preemption laws dealing with pesticide use, whereby the state holds authority over local governments.
What the judge did not substantively consider was the issue of the right of local self-government and how it must prevail against state preemption when exercised to protect health, safety, and welfare. LCCR submitted the following argument with which the court could have ruled in favor of the people and county government:
It is widely recognized that, under the Ninth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, states have the authority to recognize and secure “unenumerated” rights (rights not expressly stated in the Constitution), and thereby to establish greater rights at the state level than the protections provided under federal law. Likewise, between state and local levels of government, Article I,
Section 33 of the Oregon Constitution– which closely mirrors the Ninth Amendment – recognizes the same limitation on the state’s general powers to violate the “unenumerated” rights of the sovereign people at the local level. Within this body of “unenumerated” rights, and together with Article I, Section 1 of the Oregon Constitution, lies the people’s natural, inherent and unchallengeable right of local community self-government. Exercising this fundamental right, the people may recognize and secure expanded local rights and prohibitions that surpass current state protections. By the same token, the State cannot pass laws that hinder or prohibit the exercise of the people’s right of local community self-government. Said another way, state preemptive laws – when applied to set a “ceiling” (maximum protection allowed) rather than a “floor” (minimum protection required) for local rights-based lawmaking – violate a fundamental right in both the U.S. and Oregon constitutions. As such, current state preemptive laws – like those cited by Plaintiffs – violate the right of local community self-government, and thus cannot operate to overturn the Ordinance at issue.
“We look forward to pursuing the rights to local community self-government in the appellate courts of Oregon”, said Dan Meek, attorney for Lincoln County Community Rights.
At the time of this press release it is not known if the County will appeal the decision. Appeals will be filed by Lincoln County Community Rights and by the Siletz River Watershed, which was denied the opportunity to take part in the court proceeding.
Maria Sause firstname.lastname@example.org 541.574.2961
ABOUT LINCOLN COUNTY COMMUNITY RIGHTS
Lincoln County Community Rights is a public benefit organization that seeks to educate and empower people to exercise their right of local community self-government in matters that pertain to their fundamental rights, their natural environment, their quality of life, their health and their safety. Given the harms that people and ecosystems suffer from the practice of aerial spraying of industrial forest land with pesticides, the group drafted an ordinance to ban aerial pesticide spraying in Lincoln County, Oregon. Measure 21-177 was adopted by voters in May 2017, making Lincoln County the first county in the United States to ban aerial pesticide spraying through the vote of the people. www.lincolncountycommunityrights.org
Rebuttal from those who support Aerial Spraying
Coalition to Defeat Measure 21-177 Statement on Summary Judgment
The recent opinion from the Lincoln County Circuit Court, confirming that the County cannot regulate pesticide use, is good news. The law is clear on the issue; Ordinance 21-177 is unconstitutional and undermines our system of government. The proper authorities to evaluate, regulate, and enforce pesticide rules, with our local input, are at the State and Federal levels where adequate resources can be deployed to ensure the safety of pesticide practices for all Oregonians. The Lincoln County community deserves praise for their patience and restraint, which has given the courts time to fully and fairly review the Ordinance.
Pesticide use by Lincoln County’s farmers, foresters, fishermen, vegetation managers and pest control professionals is already carefully regulated by the Oregon Department of Agriculture and supporting agencies – as it should be. Those rules are continually reviewed and strictly enforced to protect the safety of the public and the environment, ensuring that we are held to the same high standards as similar professionals across the State.
As responsible members of our community, we are committed to accountability by being the first in line to call out bad actors in our industries. We encourage our neighbors to help us: if you are concerned about a pesticide application, please dial the State’s 211 hotline to connect with the appropriate agencies. Meanwhile, we welcome open and constructive dialogues within our community about sound management of the cherished natural resources our County enjoys, including the tools we rely upon to safely and sustainably keep those resources healthy.
CONTACT: Alan Fujishin, Director, Coalition to Defeat Measure 21-177; (541) 283-6197