A Modern Perspective on Mental Health

 Daily News  Comments Off on A Modern Perspective on Mental Health
Jun 082018


Peggy Defazio, PhD
Licensed Therapist

A Modern Perspective on Mental Health
By Dr Peggy Defazio LPC
Coastal Counseling & Consulting LLC

The Stigma of Mental Illness

The recent celebrity suicides of individuals who were thought to be happy and healthy have brought mental health back into the limelight. It’s sad that it takes suicide to get us to talk about mental health. Why are we embarrassed to talk about mental health?
In 1999, the US Surgeon General identified stigma as one of the biggest barriers to receiving mental healthcare and it’s still a barrier today. Most of us learn this stigma, this negative and judgmental attitude, towards those with mental health challenges as children. Unfortunately, many folks go through their lives believing that those with a mental illness are “crazy,” “weird,” dangerous or manipulative. This negative attitude has many people with mental illness avoiding treatment – why bother if everyone thinks they’re crazy anyway. This, of course, doesn’t help anything and can end tragically.
So, how do we, especially in rural Lincoln County, reduce this stigma? How do we encourage people to talk about their mental health as well as seek professional help?
Most authorities say that education is the answer. We must educate ourselves and others on the following facts:
mental health issues affect the majority of humans at some time or another,
talking straight-forwardly about mental health is healthy and appropriate,
a person does not choose to have a mentally illness, just as someone doesn’t choose to have cancer
people are not their diagnosis – their diagnosis is a part of who they are, not all of them.
All of us need to fight this long-standing prejudice against those with mental health issues if we truly want our community to be happy and healthy with fewer tragic endings. The National Association of Mental Illness (NAMI) is a great place to start or enhance your education on mental illness. (https://www.nami.org/#)

Letters to the Editor: The Fairgrounds issue continues…UPDATES…

 Daily News  Comments Off on Letters to the Editor: The Fairgrounds issue continues…UPDATES…
Jun 072018

The views and opinions of submitters to “Letters to the Editor” do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of NewsLincolnCounty.com, its staff or advertisers. The positions taken in the following letters are strictly those of the submitters.


June 7, 2018
Once again, the County Commissioners misstate and mislead in their efforts to foist a multi-million boondoggle on the taxpayers in Lincoln County. This time, it is the person of Commissioner Hall.

Hall shamefully alleges “facts” which are not backed up by the very plan that the Commissioners paid consultants many hundreds of thousands of dollars to develop. Let me sight just a few.

* Hall states as “fact” that “the plan calls for a new exhibit hall of about 15,000 square feet”.

* FALSE. The plan lists a range of sizes for a multi-purpose building from 12,000 – 45,000 square feet. If the 15,000 size has been selected by the Commissioners, that decision is not available on the Commons Master Planning site. Either Hall is just making up a number, or the decision-making process the Board is following is being hidden from the public.

* Hall states “Every cent the county spends on construction and operations will come from the transient room tax.” He estimates this revenue to be $425,000 annually.

* FALSE. This claim is in direct conflict with the plan the Board paid consultants to develop. That plan states:
“The annual debt payment would be about $1,060,000. The County would be able to dedicate $400,000 to $475,000 of Transient Lodging tax revenue to the debt payment, depending on the operational deficit. The County will need to find funding to cover the funding gap of $500,000 to $600,000 per year.” (emphasis added)

Why would Hall make such an outlandish claim? According to the consultant’s plan, it will actually cost over twice what Hall estimates is actually available from the room tax. Does the Board have a financing mechanism in mind that it has not shared with the public?

Taxpayers should also be aware that these figures do not include actual operation of the facility, nor annual maintenance costs.

Further, it is apparent that Hall is aware that what she is claiming as “fact” is actually intended to mislead. Why else would she later add a paragraph naming a variety of public enterprises, such as libraries and recreational centers, which provide services to the public but are not self-sustaining? I love libraries and art centers and the Lincoln County Fair! I support paying for them with my tax dollars. I don’t support this particular proposal because it does not reflect what we in Lincoln County actually need or want! This proposal is full of hidden costs, unsupported claims, and lame allegations of public mandate.

Hall continues to claim that the Board has a mandate for this fiasco because of two approvals of a County transient lodging tax. Here again, she misstates the language of the 2016 ballot measure, and, therefore, what the voters actually supported. Ballot Measure 21-165 actually states:

“The additional revenue would be available for future fairgrounds redevelopment and operations, or similar facilities and operations throughout the County” (emphasis added).

This is not, as Hall asserts, a mandate for this specific project on this specific site. Further, we all know that placing a tax on tourists is not the same as agreeing to tax ourselves, and shame on Hall and the rest of the Board for continuing to insist that they are.

Politicians have used this tactic for years—repeating the same falsehoods in the hopes that they will eventually be accepted as fact. I expect this behavior in Washington, D.C. I will not tolerate it from my own local elected officials!

So, the Board of County Commissioners continues to make false and misleading statements and continues to push a proposal that has never had the support of the voters and taxpayers of Lincoln County, which we do not need and cannot afford. Why? Do they have plan, approach or information that they have not released to the public?

The Board should stop playing us for a bunch of fools and patsies, and, instead get off this crazy, expensive merry-go-round and address what we really need—a Lincoln County Fairgrounds.

Sally Rose
South Beach

From County Commissioner Claire Hall

A new Lincoln County Fairgrounds is exactly what the public is going to get. I am sorry I wasn’t clear in my earlier submission. The construction and operating costs that Ms. Rose references from the earlier document are correct, but they are based on the consultants’ original concept, which represented the ultimate wish list of those who participated in our initial stakeholder interviews. However, after the last public meeting, we went back to the consultants with clear orders: come back with a plan that can be built and operated within the resources we have. The 15,000 square foot exhibit hall, 25,000 square foot pavilion and the thrift store re-purposed for 4-H represents the entirety of the project, and it can be built and operated without one cent of general fund dollars.

Claire Elizabeth Hall
Lincoln County Commissioner


From Sally Rose, South Beach

Interesting claim, Commissioner Hall, but where is the plan? Where are the facts? So far, we still see nothing concrete, just unsupported statements and platitudes. When will we actually see something of substance?

Sally Rose
South Beach


Hi Carol,

I didn’t mention the Urban Renewal money for two reasons: it is my
understanding that the city has not finalized its committment of these
funds, and if they are provided, they want them to go for ancillary
improvements like utility upgrades and additional parking, as opposed to
the construction of the project itself. As the Urban Renewal Agency for
the City of Newport, the City Council has the authority to determine
whether or not the allocation of funds to support the project benefits
Newport residents and taxpayers. I am not able to speak for the
council–they can and will do that for themselves–but my understanding
is that they see this project as being within the broad scope of what
Urban Renewal is designed to accomplish–improved community
infrastructure that stimulates economic activity and growth.

The revised plan shows a projected $550,000 per year available for the
Commons project through the 2007 and 2016 room tax measure. The revised
plan which will be presented to the Master Plan Steering Committee on
Thursday allocated $400,000 of that per year for capital costs over
thirty years, with $150,000 for an operating subsidy. If room tax
revenues continue to rise and income from the facility exceeds
projections, we could pay off the capital costs sooner. If the need for
subsidy exceeds the $150,000 figure, we can extend the payout of the
capital costs. Our directive to the consultants has been clear–redesign
the project to fit within the means available to us. I have not, and
never will support any kind of subsidy from the county general fund to
build or operate this facility.

I hope this helps clarify where the county stands on this.

Claire Elizabeth Hall
Lincoln County Commissioner
My pronouns are she/her/hers


Dear Commissioner Hall —

Your June 5 opinion piece in News Lincoln County raises some serious

Most troubling is your statement: “This will cost local property
taxpayers money. False. Every cent the county spends on construction
and operations will come from the transient room tax.”

This is disingenuous at best, as substantial funding for the project —
some $3 million — is expected to come from City of Newport property
taxpayers, who unequivocally qualify as “local property taxpayers.” I
urge you therefore to publish a correction to your misleading statement.

Six questions were asked by Gerry Barrett in April after meeting with
you about this project (see Mr. Barrett’s attached News Lincoln County
letter). At least three of Mr. Barrett’s six questions remain loudly

— If there is not enough money in the bank to pay for the project will
the commissioners borrow the balance?

— If not, how will you finance the budget shortfall?

— Is there any risk that the citizens of Lincoln County will be asked
to fund the construction phase or to fund the operational phase of the
Commons if the room tax allocated to this project is insufficient?

These are valid questions that the public needs answers to, particularly
given the fact that a large portion of Lincoln County citizens who are
Newport property tax payers are already expected to fund the
construction phase. Mr. Barrett’s breakdown of the numbers makes
abundantly clear that this project cannot even be started without city
taxpayers’ money, and that room tax revenues will not be nearly enough
for operating and maintenance costs, to say nothing of the inevitable
cost over-runs that always occur. Those room tax revenues upon which
this entire project relies are themselves notoriously subject to the
whims of climate, politics, stock market crashes, international trade
wars, gas prices, and other dire effects on tourism. To expect this
variable and unreliable source of revenue to pay for such a grandiose
project is pie-in-the-sky economics.

Your June 5 article also states “People didn’t vote to support this.
False. They voted in both 2007 and 2016 to dedicate room tax revenues
for it, by a 60 percent margin each time. The 2016 measure was very
specific: ‘The new tax revenue would be dedicated to increase support
for the redevelopment of the fairgrounds… and also be available for
operations of the facilities at that location.'”

This statement is also extremely misleading. We may indeed have voted
to dedicate new tax revenue to “increase support for the redevelopment
of the fairgrounds,” but we did NOT vote for a huge allocation of
Newport property taxes as well as massive county debt to pay for an
unnecessary new building and pavilion instead of repairing, improving,
and maintaining current fairground structures. I urge you therefore to
publish a correction to your false assertion that voters approved paying
for a multi-million dollar project with taxpayers’ money.

I have personally seen far too many projects like this one either fail
and go unfinished, or cost taxpayers inordinately far more than
originally projected. All those failures began with the same kind of
misleading and unrealistic claims and obfuscations apparent in your
article and in the commissioners’ public statements.

Because voters never approved spending taxpayers’ funds for this
project, no further action or funds should be committed to it before it
is placed on the ballot again, this time with an honest, accurate
statement of where all of its funding shall come from.

Because to this day we, the public, have not been fully informed about
the true costs of the project, the commissioners should publish a
thorough and above all honest accounting of all estimated costs,
including estimated costs of associated infrastructure improvements such
as water, sewer, electrical, plumbing, storm water, parking, increased
law enforcement, etc. Such accounting should also include an honest and
unexpurgated discussion of all alternative funding options and their
potential financial liabilities for county taxpayers.


Carol Van Strum
Five Rivers, Oregon

Burn pile explodes, woman burned while tending to burn pile off 229 and Fun River Lane

 Daily News  Comments Off on Burn pile explodes, woman burned while tending to burn pile off 229 and Fun River Lane
Jun 072018

A woman tending to an outside burn pile was burned this afternoon when something inside the pile exploded, showers the woman was fire and sparks. Initial reports from the scene say the woman was burned on her face, arms and hands.

Arriving fire-rescue from Lincoln City said the burns are not severe. Life Flight out of Newport that was ready to launch to the scene was told to stand-down (cancel).

Lesson: Be sure you know what’s in a burn pile. Even “empty” pressurized gas bottles or containers can explode with very little material inside them.

Coast Guard combs the beach and offshore for missing Colorado teen – no sign of him – Search ends

 Daily News  Comments Off on Coast Guard combs the beach and offshore for missing Colorado teen – no sign of him – Search ends
Jun 072018

Coast Guard find no sign of the teen. Call off search.
Courtesy photo

Names of the father and son who drowned:

Robert Allen, age 50, from Fort Collins, Colorado
Samuel Allen, age 17, from Fort Collins, Colorado
Coast Guard ends search from the air – no sign of the teen in a black wetsuit on a boogy board…

On Wednesday at about 2:21pm, Oregon State Police Troopers and emergency personnel responded to a report of a water rescue occurring just off the beach near Rockaway Beach.

Authorities say a 17 year old male from Fort Collins, Colorado was riding a Boogie Board in the surf when a wave knocked him off his board. Family members, on the shore, could see he was in distress. His father, age 50, from Fort Collins, Colorado dove into the surf in an attempt to rescue his son. After several minutes, family members lost sight of both father and son.

A search and rescue effort was begun involving the US Coast Guard and local emergency responders. While flying over the area, a US Coast Guard helicopter located and recovered the 50 year old male, who was deceased. The 17 year old male is still missing and is presumed to be deceased.

Burn activities about to be shut down or tightly constrained for the summer season across the state….

 Daily News  Comments Off on Burn activities about to be shut down or tightly constrained for the summer season across the state….
Jun 062018

Fire restrictions are, or soon will be, in effect on lands in southern and central Oregon that are protected by Oregon Department of Forestry districts and forest protective associations.

Fire season goes into effect on Friday, June 8 in:

Coos Forest Protective Association – Curry, Coos and coastal Douglas County
Douglas Forest Protective Association – most of non-coastal Douglas County
Klamath-Lake District – Klamath County and western Lake County

Fire season is in effect since June 1 in:

Southwest Oregon District – covering all of Jackson and Josephine counties
Central Oregon District – covering Hood River and Grant counties and portions of Crook, Deschutes, Gilliam, Harney, Jefferson, Morrow, Wasco, Wheeler and northwestern Lake counties
Walker Range Forest Protective Association – northern Klamath County and part of northwest Lake County

Local conditions dictate when fire risk reaches the level that fire restrictions start to become warranted. You can check whether fire season is in effect in your area and what restrictions or closures may be in place by visiting ODF’s external website.

Restrictions common to all lands now in fire season include a ban on backyard debris burning, and a prohibition on use of exploding targets and tracer ammunition. Sky lanterns are prohibited year-round in Oregon.

In announcing the start of fire season in Central Oregon, District Forester Mike Shaw said, “Across the district, spring has brought limited rainfall and right now we are seeing fuel conditions drier than they were at this time last year.”

Southwest Oregon District Forester Dave Larson said, “The district’s hope is that going into fire season will help curb the number of human-caused fires, especially escaped debris burn piles.”

Although the numbers of acres burned so far this year has been modest, almost 150 wildfires have already been reported on land protected by ODF. Almost two thirds of the fires have occurred in districts and forest protective associations that will be in fire season by Friday.

Click here for coupon